Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Weapons on TF toys - making sense?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    9th Apr 2008
    Location
    WEST AUST
    Posts
    5,077

    Default Weapons on TF toys - making sense?

    Is it me or is hasbro now just adding weapons onto alt modes and not really integrating them?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14th May 2008
    Location
    Back in Brisbane
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    What are some of your main examples? The C-clip weapons are what I thought of for this thread but they are usually the 2nd,3rd or 4th weapon I think
    "I am not a gun. I'm hitting people with a hammer. On Mars."
    The Iron Giant / David Wildgoose

  3. #3
    Join Date
    19th Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydneytron
    Posts
    3,988

    Default

    For Mechtech toys yes, but isn't that their thing?

    I wouldn't call it a new trend till it starts crossing between lines.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    I'd definitely say Mech-Tech weapons are a silly gimmick really, some work alright like that of the Voyager Class figures but other wise they look absolutely crap.
    I thought the C-Clip/3mm Weapons were an excellent idea that should've been continued and furthered as they were far less intrusive and had far more play value IMO.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    14th Jun 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    513

    Default

    Or Minicons. Some of those were as pointless as a frozen pea. I did like the Starsaber team that combined 3 planes into a sword around the same height/ length of a deluxe toy. The overall length being useless if being wielded by a deluxe, but anything Mega/ Ultra sized it was gold

    Some of those Powercore Combiners Minicons were crap too.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    30th Apr 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    522

    Default

    I always thought the Star Sabre looked too small when it was being held by guys bigger than deluxe size. I wish there was another Mini-con in that team just so the "blade" was longer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,779

    Default

    I like MechTech - it's a fun gimmick. And it's pretty cool how the MechTech ports can cover themselves up instead of remaining as gaping holes like on so many other Transformer toys... that's a neat feature IMO, and it doesn't impede on the overall engineering of the toy.

    I also like Mini-Cons... for their size most of them are pretty well engineered. Sometimes better engineered than their larger and more expensive Autobot/Decepticon counterparts! Look at Armada Scavenger and Rollbar for example... Scavenger is an absolute craphouse toy, but Rollbar's a pretty decent Mini-Con. Scavenger's robot mode is notoriously compromised by its stupid "walking" gimmick (meaning that the toy has no true legs) - and the overall body itself is bricktastic. Rollbar on the other hand has a solid vehicle mode and pretty good articulation in robot mode - particularly the legs which have excellent articulation for such a small toy. Skyboom shield isn't that much better either (but again, each individual Mini-Con's quite nice). Perceptor is probably the best Mini-Con combined mode.

    Star Sabre is not a great sword when combined -- falls apart too easily -- but the individual Mini-Cons are really well designed IMO with a lot of exquisite detail in the sculpt and design. The PCC Mini-Cons are fail. I don't like how Hasbro calls them Mini-Cons... feels insulting to other Mini-Cons. The cool thing about Mini-Cons is, even if you don't like the Powerlinx gimmicks on the larger toys, the Mini-Cons on their own are quite nice toys -- like Micromasters but with better detail and engineering.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •